I’m not one overly given to introspection. Still there are those moments when that insidious thought of “what’s really the point of what I’m doing?” insinuates itself into the forefront of my brain.
There
has been progress.
I can look back and see how the young people I’ve worked with have grown as individuals. A large part of that is due to my getting them together twice weekly and refereeing their interactions, guiding them to more of a relationship of mutual respect and understanding. We don’t tend to have hurt feelings, emotional blow-ups or people stomping out every other meeting anymore, and haven’t for a while.
....Progress.
I can see how some of the foundational concepts needed for a Christ-centered and Grace-based Christian life have slowly been absorbed after hundreds and hundreds of repetitions. I have seen some grasp of the basics of true Bible study sinking in, attempting to actually apply textual analysis. (As opposed to the traditional approach of: “I think ____”, countered by “Well, I think ______!” and then verbally slugging it out, as it were.)
Progress, yes?
I
have seen these young people begin to take an active role in
ministering to others within and without the church, without needing
someone to take them by the hand and talk them into it. That’s a
good thing, since at this point, the median age of our ‘youth’ is
22 or so.
Definitely progress...
Definitely progress...
That
said, in every category I’ve mentioned, there are also tendencies
to emulate the older believers around them. (Most
of whom I haven’t
been teaching twice a week.)
Patterns of thought and behavior the complete opposite of what I have
tried to teach and model still display themselves on a regular basis:
-The
desire to argue others down once I have any smidgen of knowledge to
lord over them.
-Demanding
respect from others without having even attempted to earn it.
-Avoiding
conflicts with others by simply avoiding them, not even trying to be
a true friend.
-Trying
to get others to adapt their behavior in accordance with my personal
convictions.
-Approaching
Bible study as a way to prove personal conclusions instead of trying
to actually understand the plain meaning of the text, in its natural
context.
Here’s
one example that has both been a great encouragement and
simultaneously a source of depression, frustration, and questioning
for me:
One
of the folks in the group, after attending Bible studies faithfully
for a couple of years, made a comment one night that really thrilled
me. Out of the blue, he said, “You know, the one thing that I’ve
really appreciated that Will has taught us, and I’ll remember even
when he’s not around is this whole 'Context’ thing. The idea that
I can’t just take any verse and make it say whatever I want... it
has verses and paragraphs, and chapters that surround it that help me
understand it. That’s pretty important, and it’s really made a big
difference in how I read the Bible!” Well, having talked about
that very basic idea hundreds upon hundreds of times, it was a great
encouragement to realize that it had hit home for at least one
person.
However,
this very same person has since that time floored me on several
occasions with a complete lack of the concept of context regarding
doctrine,
not just individual verses. We were looking into passages that have
been misused often enough that they don’t even really give them a
second look. (As the Russian saying goes: ‘Repetition is the Mother
of Learning.”) I was pointing out the larger context, contrasting
what IS being taught with what wasn’t even in
the passage, addressing the whole question of why introduce concepts
to the passage that aren’t even present.
All three times, there would be a pause, and this person blurts out “but Will, you’re teaching us Calvinism!!” (A dangerous contemporary heresy that teaches that eternal salvation is indeed eternal.) I calmly replied that on the contrary, I was not teaching any one doctrine or understanding, simply trying to look at what the passage actually said. The passages in question were used to make believers question their eternal security, imply that they must at least in part earn their salvation, or threaten them with the possibility of eternal damnation. In all three instances the passages were not addressing the subject of one’s eternal abode one way or the other.
All three times, there would be a pause, and this person blurts out “but Will, you’re teaching us Calvinism!!” (A dangerous contemporary heresy that teaches that eternal salvation is indeed eternal.) I calmly replied that on the contrary, I was not teaching any one doctrine or understanding, simply trying to look at what the passage actually said. The passages in question were used to make believers question their eternal security, imply that they must at least in part earn their salvation, or threaten them with the possibility of eternal damnation. In all three instances the passages were not addressing the subject of one’s eternal abode one way or the other.
The
problem was that I was the only
one he’d ever
heard actually address what the passages taught. When it sounded like
I was challenging the only way he’d ever heard these passages
explained, he assumed that I was subtly introducing a doctrine that
is deemed heresy in this church. This person is a personal and family
friend, he has nothing against me, has no criticism of the way I
live or minister... but he does know that I have some differences of
conviction doctrinally with the church, and therefore assumed that I
was simply trying to influence them toward my own viewpoint.
That’s
what most of the other church leaders would do, after all.
That’s
largely what he hears Sunday after Sunday... one man’s opinions
introduced into some verse or passage, three sermons in a row, then
everyone else’ opinions as they discuss it after church. Then it’s
argued out in home group meetings. Whoever is most eloquent,
persuasive or intimidating wins, having convinced the others that
“bro. Boris’s way is the Right
way to understand ______.”
So
speaking of context,
I can’t help but wonder what kind of impact I’m having long-term
here, progress or no progress. The whole context of the church here
is almost diametrically opposed to what I hold dearest, and I have
tried to teach and demonstrate what I believe are foundational
concepts needed for a healthy, mature, loving and grace-filled and
Christian life.
I
can only hope and pray that Christ has indeed shown his grace through
my imperfect representation, his love through my inadequate
interactions, his strength in and through my weakness.
That
is what He promised...
and that
is what I have held on to, even as I’ve felt like just saying “I
quit.”
I
know that we have done what we can here, and as a family we are praying and looking
for another place to live and minister. Still, right now staying here,
staying involved in the church seems to only drag me down and keep
me from focusing on moving on as I should.
Lord,
let me cling to you as my only strength in the face of my daily
weakness. Let me truly live by faith, focusing ever more upon your
beauty and not my context. I need your grace to fill me to
overflowing just so I can move forward.
2 comments:
Praying for you in this context....
It has been a while since I've stopped by your blog. My family lives and works in Berdyansk. I appreciate your words and can relate to the question of why we are here. Thanks for putting it into words. Heather Powell
Post a Comment